The different between what brings physical evidence into demonstrative and real evidence is real evidence represent or involved the production of some sort of object. The object had to have some huge part in whatever that took place which has to include some exhibition of different injured on the body such as demonstrative evidence which is some type of way has no value within itself to stand up in the courtroom but through its visual aids like models, maps, photograph can help the Jury or Judge get a better understanding of the testimony of the witness .
Demonstrative evidence is Just a way to engage into the courtroom to let people know or feel what the victim went through in a way. That is kind of smart because certain cases demonstrative evidence work wonderfully for the prosecution. Examples of real evidence can be material objects, photographs, and video recordings. The material object evidence can be the murder weapon in a murder scene that will be consider a Evidence By swanky find a murder weapon because usually the guilty party would get rid of it and destroy it.
But, that is when oral evidence and photographs of the murder weapon or omen seeing it comes to play and it seems to be admissible in court rooms so actually having those objects work perfectly. Photographs are harder real evidence because since 1864 they have been found as admissible evidence. For a photograph to be proven as real evidence it has to be proven as authenticity. The photographer has to be able to prove that he or she actually took picture . This type of real evidence can be very tricky it some type of way.
Recordings and things capture on video are being used in the courtroom more and more lately. But in the United States in order or video recordings to be used I the courtroom as a form of real evidence the prosecution has to prove that the video or tape is genuine or authenticity of the video or tape and it most cases the defense will object on that ground so I would be up to the Judge on whether or not to allow the recording to be put to the Jury. Real and or physical evidence is very important to an investigation because that could be the only thing that officer need to arrest the bad guy.
Most detectives if not all would say having real evidence like the murder weapon or an eye witness would be a open and lose case because most of the time that is exactly what they are looking for to help solve the case in the first place so having real or physical evidence is very important to officers because that can make or break their case . Demonstrative Evidence Demonstrative evidence is an illustration that helps the Judge or Jury understand an oral testimony that was giving and allowing them to somehow see what the victim was going through next .
For example, if a person died of lead poison and an expert witness like an toxicologist testifies to that then form demonstrative evidence the erectors would present a chart of the human body and show the Jury the circulatory pathway the poison traveled. When it comes to demonstrative there are specific rules that have to be followed. The first rule would be having a piece of evidence like an object, testimony or fact of some sort to go alone with the presentation. The other general rule of demonstrative evidence is the foundational requirements.
There has to be certain steps that need to be followed such as accuracy and authentication which relates to “laying the foundation” . Demonstrative evidence can be helpful when it comes to ideas that are difficult to speak about but make sense when it comes to using a picture, diagram, model or simulation of some sort. The Juror seem to be more interesting in what they see then what they hear because the Juror could become bored and uninteresting quickly Just sitting listening into someone talk the entire time .
Direct Evidence/ Circumstantial Evidence Direct evidence is usually the eyewitness testimony which is based on that individual observation or knowledge and if everything turns out to be true then that will directly rove the case without having to result to inference and assumption . Circumstantial evidence which often is related to indirect evidence differs from direct evidence that proves that a fact is true without any presumption required.
Circumstantial evidence is based off numerous of other facts but cannot be really proven Just basically a lot of guessing. Many people who used circumstantial evidence in the courtroom tries to argue that the numerous of facts that have can be proven due to reason and experience but most of the time is does not hold up in court . So the different from itself without having inference, assumption and presumption. On the other hand, circumstantial evidence need all of them to even try to stand up in the courtroom.